DNA Lineages(Eckford:F-27)
#1160
| Father | Fairbairn |
| WebIntro(Matches) | Descendants, F-35 & (F-27) respectively, of the Kelso line of James & Margaret (LEARMONTH), and the engineer Robert (married Elizabeth YOUNG) are showing as an excellent match (66/67), being in a sub grouping of "clump 2", those sharing marker 570 = 18. The next closest matches belong to descendants of Robert and Margaret (PATERSON), and James and Elspeth (TROTTER). F-35's line can plausibly be traced back to early Kelso as far as Francis and Agnes (DICKIESON) FAIRBAIRN, married there in 1704. F-27's is more problematic. The earliest ancestor for F-27 is a civil engineer Robert, born Eckford, with no matching baptism handy, it is rather hard to slot him into his rightful place on the tree. His age in the only confirmed census sighting (1851 Bothwell, LKS) is unclear and could be 42,52 or 62. Given the age of his family, 42 seems the most likely, which would make him born about 1809 - not that that helps find either his birth, or death. It is tempting to say that he's the Robert son of Alexander and Isabella (ATCHISON) who married 1808 Coldstream, given that Robert appears to have a son John born Coldstream, but that should make F-27 most closely match Robert(F-34) instead. Robert(F-34) is in "clump 2", but one of those only GD1 from the modal for all of Lineage 1, rather than in this subgroup of "clump 2" (570-18). |
| GeneticDistance(Testee12Markers) | At 12 markers the theoretical Genetic Distance (GD) calculations from (Eckford:F-27) show: an exact match to 10 in Lineage 1 "clump 2", and GD1 to 8 in "clump 1." |
| GeneticDistance(Testee25Markers) | At 25 markers the theoretical Genetic Distance (GD) calculations from (Eckford:F-27) show: an exact match to 9 in Lineage 1 "clump 2" (we've lost (F-8) from exact match, slipping to GD1 because of marker 447 which he has a unique value of for all of Lineage 1), and GD1 to 7 from both "clumps", and GD2 growng to 3, all from "clump 1". The next panel is the most interesting however, and should aid Robert of Eckford's placement in the jigsaw. |
| GeneticDistance(Testee37Markers) | At 37 markers the theoretical Genetic Distance (GD) calculations from (Eckford:F-27) show: zero to (F-35); 1 to LE(F-31), NJ(F-30), Doug(GOODFELLOW) and Tom; 2 to David(CAMPBELL), Patrick, David(TROTTER), (F-11), Joe and Charles(Elliott); 3 to Ron and Mike(IRWIN); 4 to (Irwin), John(JOHNSTON) and Martin; 5 to Earl, Roy and Michael; 6 to Doug(BLAKEY) and Michael(Simpson); 7 to William; with FT DNA TiP showing a 93% probability that (F-27) and ( F-35 share a common ancestor within 6 generations,98.9% by 10, 99.5% by 12 - but 67 marker results would be more revealing, given that this match includes cdyb=37, also exhibited by F-30 who is within the sub group of "clump 2" with 413a=25, one of the markers in panel 38 to 67. |
| GeneticDistance(Testee67Markers) | At 67 markers the theoretical Genetic Distance (GD) calculations from (Eckford:F-27) show: zero to Geoffrey; 1 to (F-35); 2 to Charles(Elliott), Patrick, David(TROTTER) and Joe; 3 to Mike(IRWIN), (F-25), Stewart and RF(Bob); 4 to John(JOHNSTON) and David(CAMPBELL); 5 to Michael(Simpson), Doug(GOODFELLOW) and LE(F-31); 6 to Martin; 7 to (F-11), Michael, Tom, Earl and Roy; ie he firmly belongs to the sub group in clump 2 with marker 570 = 18, being marginally closer to (F-8) and (F-7) than to the James & Helen (GOODFELLOW) line in the same sub-group, and now (Mar, 2011), with an exact match to Geoffrey (F-39). |
| Lineage(Testee) | (Eckford:F-27) was found to be part of Fairbairn Lineage 1i, although whether his line connects where shown (Robert son of James & Christian) is not necessarily true, see here for chart. |
| DNA(ResultLink) | Click here to see the dna results for (Eckford:F-27). |
| Charts | Wanted: Robert and Elizabeth (Young) Fairbairn Fairbairn Lineage 1i Lineage 1 DNA Theoretical "Signature" for "clump 2" |
| Last Edited | 29 Mar 2011 |
Close